A is a shy guy and is not able to gather courage to propose to B. A is also a logician so he takes the help of predicate logic. Now A is trying to make B understand predicate logic, but actually he wants to propose to B. He goes on as following:
Let us first define the predicates.
M(x,y) : x and y marry
L(x,y) : x loves y
A predicate can be true or false. Just to see some properties of the above predicates,
M(A,B) <=> M(B,A)
“I am married to you” means “you are married to me”.
L(A,B) => L(B,A)
This statement is not true. If I love you, then it does not mean that you love me. Hence the predicate on left does not imply the predicate on right.
But now, if I say reverse them, that is
L(B,A) => L(A,B)
This statement is true. This is because whether you love me or not, I will always love you. Hence there cannot be a case where you love me and I don’t love you.
Now we also have,
L(A,B) ^ L(B,A) => M(A,B)
i.e. if I love you and you love me, then we will marry. But now since I always love you, we can remove L(A,B). Thus,
L(B,A) => M(A,B)
Thus if you love me, we will marry.
Do you love me?
2 comments:
sounds so ankit guptaish.........!!!
and yes...
i did get the equations!!!!!
haha...
mast tha launde...
Post a Comment